Oracle Connects Bank Payment Systems To Swift’s Blockchain Ledger
TL;DR Oracle is integrating its banking and blockchain infrastructure with Swift’s shared ledger for tokenized deposits. Banks can connect their own tokenized-deposit systems to cross-bank payment flows while retaining control of the und...
AI refinement failed — excerpt only
The AI model was rate-limited when this draft was created. The text below is a raw excerpt of the source article; rewrite it before publishing.
TL;DR Oracle is integrating its banking and blockchain infrastructure with Swift’s shared ledger for tokenized deposits. Banks can connect their own tokenized-deposit systems to cross-bank payment flows while retaining control of the underlying assets. Oracle Banking Payments will link those digital-asset flows with existing ISO 20022 processing. Oracle is building a bridge between the systems banks already use to move money and Swift’s emerging blockchain ledger. The company announced the integration at Sibos in Miami on September 28, giving financial institutions another route into tokenized-deposit payments without requiring them to replace their existing core infrastructure. Banks Keep Their Own Deposits Swift’s ledger is not designed to become one enormous bank balance sheet. Individual institutions still maintain their own tokenized-deposit infrastructure. The shared ledger coordinates payment commitments between those institutions so the digital representations of commercial bank money can work across bank boundaries. Oracle’s integration is designed to connect the two sides. Oracle Blockchain Platform can host the smart contracts needed to interact with the Swift ledger, while its Digital Assets Data Nexus provides the surrounding digital-asset infrastructure. Oracle Banking Payments then links those blockchain events with conventional ISO 20022 payment processing. The result is intended to let a bank handle ordinary payments and tokenized-deposit payments through the same operating model. Tokenized Deposits Need Interoperability To Matter A bank creating its own blockchain deposit token is only useful up to a point. If the token works inside one institution but cannot interact cleanly with money at another bank, much of the advantage disappears. That is why interoperability has become one of the central questions around bank-issued digital money. Swift is approaching that problem as a coordination layer. Oracle is approaching it from the bank’s internal systems. The integration supports payment orchestration, custodial wallets, signing infrastructure and the connection between blockchain transactions and a bank’s existing payment stack. Oracle says banks remain in control of their own tokenized-deposit systems rather than handing that role to Swift. That distinction will matter to institutions that want faster settlement without surrendering control
More from peatpost
Bitcoin’s rebound approaches the $85,000 zone where past buyers may sell
Bitcoin and Ethereum extended their weekend recovery, although on-chain indicators and derivatives positioning suggest the rebound faces significant obstacles. Data from CryptoSlate showed that Bitcoin briefly climbed above $84,000 after...
XRP ETFs extend a 13-week inflow streak as Bitcoin, Ethereum and Solana funds shed $1.25 billion
US-listed XRP ETFs extended their inflow streak to 13 weeks as Bitcoin , Ethereum and Solana funds suffered nearly $1.25 billion in combined withdrawals during the week ended Oct. 9. Bitcoin ETFs recorded $681.1 million in net withdrawal...
Locked liquidity did not stop this $14 million crypto pool drain
The PancakeSwap pool for 79AU, 79thVault’s token, lost $14.35 million in USDT on Oct. 7 through two selling wallets, according to a Bitquery investigation published Oct. 8. Bitquery found that 79% of the pool’s liquidity-provider receipt...
Discussion
0 commentsNo comments yet — be the first to weigh in.